Tuesday, 24 July 2012

Pushti Marga, Singing Krishna and Devotional Experience


A few months ago, I finished reading A. Whitney Sanford's Singing Krishna: Sound Becomes Sight in Paramananda’s Poetry. I reviewed the book on my Shelfari account and I’m posting the brief review here for the benefit of my readers. 

'Singing Krishna' is beautifully written; rich in detail and emotion, this study of Paramananda's classic poetry deserves to be called a classic in its own right. The author's familiarity with the theology and textual background of Braja devotional poetry enables her to identify the nuances and subtleties of Paramananda's poetry which would otherwise go unnoticed to the uninitiated. Sanford's guiding commentary on the poetry enables the reader to participate in the enactment of the poetry themselves and provides them with the framework and apparatus with which they can explore their own connection (and perhaps, place) in the poetry.

It's difficult to find anything in the book that warrants major criticism. It would, however, have been useful if the author had provided a transliteration of the poetry- this would enable the reader to read the poetry in its original language. Since this work purports to explicate the role of Paramananda's poetry in the ritual cycle of Krishna's service, it would have been that much more useful if the author had drawn more explicit connections between the periodic ritual performances and the poetry. All in all, a wonderful work that I thoroughly recommend'

As the review points out, I think that the author, A. Whitney Sanford, did a truly impressive job in conveying the devotional spirit and theological richness of the Pushti Marga tradition. I remember reading the book and thinking how much my own tradition can learn from the way the Pushti Marg tradition structures its rituals and practices its devotion. As is common with most of the Krishna-centered bhakti traditions, Pushti Margi’s divide the cycle of Krishna’s daily life into eight divisions, each division corresponding, in turn, to a particular lila and bhava, pastime and (dominant) emotion or mood.

This division of Krishna's daily life into eight periods is known traditionally as ashtayam lila. Many of the devotional movements that emerged in Braja during the 16th and 17th centuries have instituted, in their temples, some variation of the ashtayam seva; in Vaishnavism the deity or murti is worshipped and served as a conscious, living form of Krishna; a svarupa that requires constant care and attention. In other words, proper devotional participation in deity worship requires all of Krishna's needs to be attended to. As Krishna's lila or playful sports change throughout the day, his needs similarly vary depending on the occasion.

The ashtayam lila or Krishna's eternal eightfold daily pastimes involve, according to the Pushti Marg tradition, the following activities: Krishna is woken in the morning, dressed shortly thereafter and then instructed to carry out his cow-herding duties. At midday the Lord returns home for his midday meal where he is offered a lavish feast. His midday lunch is followed by a quick nap until he is woken again and allowed to resume his cow-herding past times. After an additional snack, Bhagavan begins preparations to bring his cows home. As the sun dips over the horizon, Shyamsundar returns with his herd of cows only to be greeted by the restive gopis, who have suffered all day in separation from their beloved Lord. The final period of the day sees Krishna retire to his bed chamber for the duration of the evening. He's had a long tiresome day and welcomes the opportunity to secure some rest. 

What distinguishes the Pushti Marg tradition from its Vaishnava counterparts is the aesthetically rich configuration of its rituals and darshans. The sanskrit word 'darshan' means 'to see' or 'to view' and in the ritual context refers specifically to the periods wherein the deity of Krishna is made available for public viewing. There are eight darshan periods the day, each of which corresponds to the divisions of Krishna's daily life or his ashtayam lila. These darshan periods are known, traditionally, by the following names (listed in chronological order): Mangala, Shringar, Gval, Raj Bhoga, Utthapan, Bhog, Sandhya and Shayan.

What I find so attractive in Pushti Marg is its unrivalled ability to create remarkable darshan experiences that enable devotees to tangibly participate in the deity's ashtayam lila. For most temples, the darshan periods, visually at least, look generally quite similar. In other words, though they may be a change in the deity's clothing or another slight modification to the ritual structure, by and large, there is nothing that visually distinguishes one darshan period from another. With the Pushti Marg, things are radically different; each darshan period is configured in such a way so as to enable devotees present to perceive and realize the actual lila that the deity performs during the particular darshan period. So, for example, at Nathdwara (a site of huge religious importance for the Pushti Marg tradition- it houses the deity of Srinathji), the Raj Bhog darshan commences with the blowing of trumpets and playing of drums (so as to announce to all present the commencement of the darshan). Privately, the Lord will be seated behind a beautiful facade of a regal pavilion made usually from one of a number of materials (typically, either, gold or silver). A pichoi (decorated backdrop) detailing the lila of the period enhances the visual experience and embellishes the temple setting. All in all, the darshan experience constitutes a veritable feast for the eyes and acts as a beautiful stimulant of devotion.

Surdas
In my view, what really adds to the darshan experience and renders it utterly unique is the Pushti Marg practice of Haveli Sangeet. Haveli is the name that the Pushti Margis use to refer to their temples and sangeet, of course, refers to song or music. In Pushti Marga, temple musicians offer a variety of bhajans and padas (sacred poems) to the deity, all of which are sung in accordance with the season, darshan period and bhav or dominant mood. The actual selection of the poems will vary from Haveli to Haveli but more often than not they are selected from the compositions of the Asthachap poets- a famous entourage of eight devotional poets all belonging to the Pushti Marg tradition. Four of the poets, Surdas, Paramanandadas, Kumbhandas and Krishnadas, were disciples of Sripad Vallabhacharya a leading figure in the Bhakti Movement of the 15th and 16th century.

Asthachap Poets
By reciting and singing only those poems that detail the deity's lila of the relevant darshan period, the Haveli Sangeet experience enhances the devotees ability to participate directly in the ashtayam lila of Bhagavan. In fact, this recognition of music's capacity to stimulate and enhance devotional experience is precisely what Sanford is getting at when she speaks about 'sound becoming sight' in the poetry of Paramananda. 


In the Chaitanya Vaishnava temples that I've visited, this meticulous approach to the aesthetics of the darshan period seems to be lacking. The ornamentation and dress of the deity (what we call shringara) is often elaborate and thoughtfully arranged but, in and of itself, this doesn't really provide the laity with a setting or a mood conducive enough to facilitate participation in the ashtayam lila. The darshan experience and rituals performed do not, for example, indicate the lila or bhava of the period. The problem is exacerbated, in one sense, by the style of kirtan that is performed during the darshan and arati period.  
Vallabhacharya

I remember visiting Bhaktivedanta Manor (a beautiful ISKCON temple situated in Watford) for the Mangal Arati period early one morning. The congregational recitation of the Hare Krishna maha mantra forms a key part of the liturgical set-up at the temple; I have no problem with this. The problem that I sometimes experience is that the style and pitch of the kirtan, if conducted improperly, can often interfere with the appropriate mood of the period. So, for example, at Mangal Arati, early in the morning when Krishna is being woken up, what I'd expect to find is a soothing low-pitch kirtan that helps to enhance the serenity of the occasion. Instead, I was confronted with an incredibly loud and high pitched kirtan where its participants, on the face of it at least, appeared to be competing with one another on decibal units.  It may just be me, but I find that such practices detract from the darshan experience and inhibits the sort of devotional feeling that I referred to earlier.















Monday, 23 July 2012

India's Presidential Election

In my introductory blog post, I set the parameters for the content of my posts by pointing out that my posts would be confined to issues relating to the theology and practice of Chaitanya Vaishnavism. Upon consideration, I've decided to dispense with these narrow parameters and write instead on any issue that interests me. That being said, I still envisage that the vast majority of my posts will be dedicated to some aspect of Hinduism but at least with this modification in place, I now have the scope to write on a broader range of issues. Since I am on the topic of broader issues, let me turn my attention to the victory of Pranab Mukherjee in India's recent presidential election.
Pranab Mukherjee


The office of the president of India is a titular post and its largely ceremonial nature means that most presidents lack the power and constitutional mandate to effect deep change either politically or societally. However, I would warn against trivialising Pranabda's electoral win. Mukherjee's stature and the fragmented nature of India's political system all militate against such a trivialisation. Let me explain.


Pranab Mukherjee's electoral victory means that he replaces Pratibha Patil as President of India. Patil's election as president in 2007 was a largely low-key affair with many in the subcontinent criticising her political inexperience and servile treatment of the Gandhi family. It's hard to avoid the conclusion that Patil's tenure as president marked the lowest point in the history of India's presidential post. When you consider the stature of previous occupants of the Rashtrapati Bhavan, like S. Radhakrishnan and Z. Hussain, Patil's election in '07 appears to constitute an anomaly. The truth, however, is that bar some exceptions, the symbolic and titular nature of the Indian presidential post has contributed, in recent years, to the post's decline in significance and importance. 


Pranab's election, although not entirely controversy-free, should restore some of the post's significance and bolster its standing in the eyes of India's citizens. His political credentials and the sheer duration of his political career endows him with an influence that extends across the breadth of the nation. For a president of India, influence is vital. 
Pratibha Patil


The fragmented and fractious nature of India's political system coupled with the growing influence and prominence of regional parties, means that, in the words of The Economist 'a hung parliament is almost certain after the next general election in 2014'. Why does this matter? Well, in moments such as these, it is the president of India who has the opportunity to request certain parties to form a coalition. This ability to play a defining role in the formation of a coalition endows Mukherjee's post with a significance that it ordinarily lacks. This explains, at least to some extent, why the Congress Party (and its allies) are in such high spirits following the success of their presidential candidate. 


As anybody familiar with the financial press will know, India's growth has deteriorated over the past few years. Dr. Manmohan Singh has been criticised publicly for his political ineptitude but I think Pranab Mukherjee has got to take some blame for India's declining fortunes as well. After all, it was Mukherjee who presided over India's economy as finance minister for three years. During his tenure, GDP growth fell from an impressive 8% a year ago to just over 5% this year. His departure has left vacant the post of finance minister and therefore invites the possibility for somebody more economically astute to take over. Whether this actually materialises remains to be seen; for the time being Dr. Singh has taken over the finance portfolio as he struggles revive a floundering economy. 


It would be silly to question Singh's economic credentials or personal integrity. There is no doubting that he does command respect internationally for his remarkable intellectual prowess and humble demeanour. I think, more than anything, the problem with him is one of appearance. His humility comes across to many in India as political diffidence and his unwavering loyalty to Sonia Gandhi reinforces the ubiquitous perception of him as Gandhi's puppet (or shall I say poodle!). 
Dr. Manmohan Singh


The ruling coalition, the United Progressive Alliance, seems to lack both the political will and necessary expertise which makes the implementation of key political/economic initiatives over the next two years seem very unlikely. I hope that I am proved wrong but we may just have to wait until after the general election to see a reinvigorated India. I'm prepared to wait that long- the question is, are India's citizens? What happens over the next two years may well decide the fate of the Congress Party.











Our Eastern Saviour: Exploring the reasons for Chaitanya's descent

A few months ago I wrote a piece exploring the theology behind Chaitanya Mahaprabhu's divine appearance in this world. Admittedly, it requires a bit of pruning and my attempt, early on in the piece, to draw a connection between the European Renaissance and the Bhakti Movement does appear slightly underdeveloped. I do think, however, that comparing the conditions that preceded the European Renaissance and the Bhakti Movement would make for a worthwhile and insightful study. What follows then is the entire extract, quoted in full:

Sunday, 22 July 2012

Beginning a new blog

Well, here it is, my first blog post. After receiving kind and encouraging suggestions from several well wishers, I’ve decided to start my own blog here.


I intend to use this blog as a forum within which I can contribute my views on a range of issues/topics dealing with Chaitanya Vaishnava theology and practice. I may, on occasion (and given my nature) stray from my intended area of focus but, all in all, this blog will make most sense to those with at least some degree of familiarity with Hinduism and (Chaitanya) Vaishnavism.


I want this blog to facilitate my desire to express myself devotionally, without abandon. In this sense, I'm looking to write on any issue that piques my interest. This should result in a rather discursive feel to my blog but I don't necessarily see this as a flaw; In so far as it guarantees my ability to ramble on all things that interest me, it renders the blog genuinely representative of my views and thoughts. In other words, an overemphasis on structure will probably end up stifling my originality and creativity and so, for the large part, I'm dispensing with it. 


Notwithstanding what I've just said, there will be some method in my madness. I do intend to organise some of my material thematically and will therefore expend greater time on certain books/issues/controversies. One project that I'm looking to start in the next few days involves comparing two commentaries on the Bhagavatam. In addition to Srila Prabhupada's commentary on the Bhagavatam, I also have in my possession Viswanath Chakravarti Thakur's commentary on the text and my intention is to try and reveal some of the similarities and differences that emerge from the juxtaposition of the two sets of commentaries. In addition to this comparative element to the project, I will try to supplement these posts by including, where possible, my own observations and realisations of the text.


For some odd reason, I’ve always felt that writing enables me to articulate that which I find difficult to articulate orally; in other words, while conversing with others on issues of theology, more often than not, I find myself constrained in what I can say. I’m not shy of controversy, especially theological controversy, and as with any religious tradition/institution, institutional considerations no doubt hinder one’s ability to express themselves openly and candidly on myriad issues. All of this, I assure you, will become clearer in the next few blogs. 

Srila Prabhupada


There isn’t much that I need to say, by way of introduction. Just so that everybody knows, I do encourage you all to participate in this ‘forum’ of mine and the easiest way, of course, for you to do that is to comment on my piece. Please be generous with your comments and criticisms since I’m sure they’ll help to enrich my own contributions. I don’t intend to respond individually to comments but will endeavor to address such comments in successive blogs. 


Vaisnava etiquette stipulates that the commencement of any project remains incomplete without a mangalarcana or the practice of invoking auspiciousness. Praying to the purva acharayas (previous teachers) and gurus of my tradition, I ask for their blessings and hope that by their grace and inspiration, this blog can act as my offering to the Chaitanya Vaishnava sampradaya: 
sri chaitanya mano 'bhistam stapitam yena bhutale
swayam rupa kada mahyam dadati sva-padantikam 

vande 'ham sri-guroh sri-yuta-pada-kamalam sri-gurun vaisnavams ca
sri-rupam sagrajatam saha-gana-raghunathanvitam tam sa-jivam
sadvaitam savadhutam parijana-sahitam krsna-caitanya-devam
sri-radha-krsna-padan saha-gana-lalita-sri-visakhanvitams ca

namo om vishnu-padaya krsna-presthaya bhu-tale
srimate bhaktivedanta svamin iti namine
namas te sarasvate deve gaura-vani-pracarine
nirvisesa-sunyavadi-pascatya-desa-tarine